Clean Oakland
  • Home
  • Sanjiv Handa
  • Gene's Blog
  • Rotunda RFP
    • Lawsuit against Rotunda Partners II >
      • Facts you should know about the Rotunda Building
      • Facts you should know about the Rotunda Garage
      • Charges in massive investment fraud case
      • Phil Tagami's Obligation
  • Gene Hazzard -Keeping eyes open
    • Hazzard substitution of attorney
    • Public Record Request [PORT] about the $100,000.00 deposit, NO Straight answer.
    • Court Reporter Transcript
    • The Power Broker? >
      • Robert Moses >
        • NY Times February 14, 2007
  • Chronology of Tagami's scheme of Private-Public Partnership with City Projects
  • Another Tagami scheme - Rotunda Building deal
    • Eight Years Later, Tagami Still Hasn’t Started Rotunda Project City Fails to Hold Developer Responsible
    • 1630 San Pablo - Parcel 2
    • Rotunda Building Loan
    • Post -Tagami Failed to Make Payments on Rotunda Development Loan
    • City Urges No Action in Tagami’s Failure to Make Payments on $12 Million Loan
  • Oakland Army Base
    • Port to Give Tagami $600 Million Exclusive
    • OAB - Wikipedia
    • OAB - Military Museum
    • Army Base Gateway Redevelopment Project
    • BAAQMD Comments on Air Monitoring Work Plan
    • Cost Sharing Agreement
    • OAB Rezoning and LDDA update
  • Billboards in Oakland
  • Port of Oakland
  • Oakland Raiders?
  • Who is running Oakland?
    • Jerry Brown
    • Don Perata
    • Judge Robert B. Freedman
    • Jacques Barzaghi
    • Gawfco Enterprises
    • Deception
    • Doug Bloch
    • Phil Tagami >
      • SF Business Times November 20, 2005
      • Rotunda wrestling
      • A conversation with Oakland developer Phil Tagami
      • Audit of $91 million Fox Theater project
      • Tagami Conflict
      • CCIG Response to Oakland Works
      • Oakland developer Phil Tagami named to state medical board
      • ‘Shotgun Phil’ hits another bullseye — with governor’s help
  • CleanOakland Store
  • CenterPoint Properties

Oakland’s Ban on Coal Exports Headed for Federal Trial

1/11/2018

0 Comments

 
HELEN CHRISTOPHI  January 11, 2018
SAN FRANCISCO (CN) — A federal judge Wednesday refused to dismiss a challenge to Oakland, California’s ban on coal exports, clearing the way for trial between the city and developers.

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said neither party had sufficiently explained the evidence, making it difficult to rule on whether the ban violated the city’s contract with developers of a West Oakland shipping terminal fighting to export coal to Asia. He set a bench trial for Jan. 16.

“I feel I have not been given enough understanding of the evidence that was in the record that was before the City Council,” Chhabria said in the four-hour hearing.

“Was the City Council given the ability to judge whether the amount of emissions from the facility would pose not merely a danger but a substantial danger? That’s what the trial is going to be about.”

Developers of the Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal (OBOT), including Phil Tagami, a friend of Governor Jerry Brown, want to haul coal by train from nearly 1,000 miles away in Utah and ship it to Asia through the $250 million facility, which is being built on an old Army base.

But in June 2016, the Oakland City Council passed two measures prohibiting the storage and handling of coal and petroleum coke at any bulk materials facility in the city. Multiple studies found that coal dust blowing off trains into nearby neighborhoods could cause asthma or cancer.

The new regulations brought the project to a halt.

Tagami sued, claiming the regulations on what would have been one of the largest coal-export terminals on the West Coast violate a 2013 development agreement and the Constitution, and are preempted by federal rail and shipping laws.

The facility would be capable of exporting up to 10 million tons of coal annually. California today exports less than 3 million tons annually.

Oakland says it has the right to enact health and safety regulations, such as the coal ban, when there is “substantial evidence of a substantial danger” to public health. At the June 2016 meeting, city officials cited multiple expert reports on which they based the substantial-danger finding, all of which concluded that storing and handling coal at the terminal would hurt air quality and health in West Oakland.

West Oakland is primarily composed of poor people of color. Due to their proximity to major freeways and industry at the Port of Oakland, residents are exposed to heavy pollution and suffer from elevated cancer rates, according to the city and the California Air Resources Board. Oakland does not want to exacerbate neighborhood pollution with coal dust.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra reiterated the city’s arguments in an amicus brief.

But Tagami attorney Robert Feldman told Chhabria on Wednesday that the coal ban violates the development agreement. Feldman, with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, called the conclusions by one of the city’s experts, Environmental Science Associates “speculative nonsense” based on math that was “completely screwed up.”

Feldman said the environmental planning firm used the wrong standard to estimate the amount of emissions the terminal would create, leading it to conclude it would create 6 tons of emissions a year, 17 times more than it actually would.

“The report isn’t worth the paper it was written on,” Feldman said.

Oakland’s attorney Kevin Siegel, with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, countered that the 6-ton estimate was “reliable substantial evidence” from an expert.

But when Chhabria asked him to justify the number, Siegel said he “cannot point to the underlying data.”

“That’s your job at trial,” Chhabria said. “If the numbers are wrong, they can’t be relied upon as substantial evidence.”

In his motion for summary judgment, Tagami, whose Oakland-based real estate firm California Capital and Investment Group owns the terminal, said the city knew before signing the development agreement that the terminal might handle coal, then bowed to political pressure against coal.

Hundreds of speakers implored the City Council at its June 2016 meeting to pass the ban, after four Utah counties said they planned to invest $53 million in the terminal in exchange for reserving roughly 50 percent of it for their coal.

Councilmember-at-large Rebecca Kaplan said in the meeting that California local, state and federal agencies had indicated they would pull funding if the project proceeded with coal included.

Two months later, Gov. Brown signed legislation banning state transportation funding for new bulk coal-shipping terminals. But the law left funding intact for existing coal projects, such as Tagami’s.

Tagami declined to comment after the Wednesday hearing.

Oakland claimed in its summary judgment motion that Tagami “surreptitiously” sought to include coal in the project while denying his intent to do so.

The city says Tagami discussed handling coal there with potential business partners as far back as 2011, but dismissed rumors that he intended to do so as “simply untrue.” Meanwhile, he struck a secret deal with Terminal and Logistics Solutions to sublease the Army property for $1.2 million and operate the facility, according to the city. That company is owned by Bowie Resources Partners, a Kentucky-based coal producer that operates mines in Utah and planned to ship its coal by rail to the Oakland terminal for export, according to both motions for summary judgment.

Oakland claims that Bowie is funding the lawsuit.

“OBOT secretly pursued plans to bring millions of tons of unhealthy, dust-generating, spontaneously combustible substances to the Terminal,” Siegel wrote in the city’s brief to the court. “OBOT communicated with the City about plans for other products at the Terminal, but was silent as to any plans regarding coal.”

Chhabria said he would defer ruling on the summary judgment arguments regarding the Constitution’s dormant Commerce Clause, which bars local governments from passing laws restraining interstate commerce.

However, he indicated he would rule for Oakland, saying cities can ban the export of a certain product if it endangers their citizens.

He declined to hear arguments on the federal preemption claims.

Attorney General Becerra’s amicus brief accuses the terminal’s developers of “attempting to expand the reach of federal preemption and the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine to prevent Oakland from exercising its police power to protect some of its most vulnerable residents from dangerous pollution.”

West Oakland residents die 12.4 years sooner than residents in richer Oakland neighborhoods, Becerra wrote, and the estimated lifetime potential cancer risk in West Oakland from emissions from the nearby port is about seven times that of the region as a whole. He cited reports by the California Air Resources Board and the Alameda County Public Health Department.

“Breathing clean air should not be a privilege for the few, but a right for all,” Becerra tweeted on Monday.

“Unfortunately, in Oakland, people of color would have to bear the brunt of the pollution emitted by the handling of coal and petroleum coke at the Bulk Oversized Terminal.”


https://www.courthousenews.com/oaklands-ban-on-coal-exports-headed-for-federal-trial/

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Gene Hazzard

    Don't Be Envious of Evil Men
    1Do not be envious of evil men, Nor desire to be with them; 2For their minds devise violence, And their lips talk of trouble.…

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    AMB
    Army Base
    City Of Oakland
    Coal
    Dan Siegel
    Garage
    Gene Hazzard
    Grant
    Hamid Moghadam
    Kaplan
    Oakland
    Phil Tagami
    Prologis
    Public Ethics Commission
    Rebecca Kaplan
    Redevelopment Agency
    Rotunda
    Tiger
    Wharf
    WOSP
    Zhao Liang

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Sanjiv Handa
  • Gene's Blog
  • Rotunda RFP
    • Lawsuit against Rotunda Partners II >
      • Facts you should know about the Rotunda Building
      • Facts you should know about the Rotunda Garage
      • Charges in massive investment fraud case
      • Phil Tagami's Obligation
  • Gene Hazzard -Keeping eyes open
    • Hazzard substitution of attorney
    • Public Record Request [PORT] about the $100,000.00 deposit, NO Straight answer.
    • Court Reporter Transcript
    • The Power Broker? >
      • Robert Moses >
        • NY Times February 14, 2007
  • Chronology of Tagami's scheme of Private-Public Partnership with City Projects
  • Another Tagami scheme - Rotunda Building deal
    • Eight Years Later, Tagami Still Hasn’t Started Rotunda Project City Fails to Hold Developer Responsible
    • 1630 San Pablo - Parcel 2
    • Rotunda Building Loan
    • Post -Tagami Failed to Make Payments on Rotunda Development Loan
    • City Urges No Action in Tagami’s Failure to Make Payments on $12 Million Loan
  • Oakland Army Base
    • Port to Give Tagami $600 Million Exclusive
    • OAB - Wikipedia
    • OAB - Military Museum
    • Army Base Gateway Redevelopment Project
    • BAAQMD Comments on Air Monitoring Work Plan
    • Cost Sharing Agreement
    • OAB Rezoning and LDDA update
  • Billboards in Oakland
  • Port of Oakland
  • Oakland Raiders?
  • Who is running Oakland?
    • Jerry Brown
    • Don Perata
    • Judge Robert B. Freedman
    • Jacques Barzaghi
    • Gawfco Enterprises
    • Deception
    • Doug Bloch
    • Phil Tagami >
      • SF Business Times November 20, 2005
      • Rotunda wrestling
      • A conversation with Oakland developer Phil Tagami
      • Audit of $91 million Fox Theater project
      • Tagami Conflict
      • CCIG Response to Oakland Works
      • Oakland developer Phil Tagami named to state medical board
      • ‘Shotgun Phil’ hits another bullseye — with governor’s help
  • CleanOakland Store
  • CenterPoint Properties